What is the Advantage and Disadvantage of Counterflow Fill

Cooling towers are essential equipment in many industrial processes and air conditioning systems, providing an efficient way to release heat into the atmosphere. They are widely used in power plants, refineries, chemical processing plants, and other industrial facilities to maintain optimal temperature for equipment and processes. Among the different types of cooling towers, crossflow cooling towers and counterflow cooling towers are the most common designs. Depending on the application, operating environment, and performance requirements, each has its own characteristics.

Longzhuo Product Page

This article will provide an in-depth comparison of crossflow cooling towers and counterflow cooling towers, analyzing them from the perspectives of design, operation, advantages and disadvantages, as well as best application scenarios.

1. Design and Operation

Crossflow Cooling Towers

In crossflow cooling towers, water flows in a horizontal direction. In a crossflow tower, air flows horizontally across the water flow direction, which intersects the downward water flow. Air enters the tower vertically, and the water flows downward across the fill. The fill helps increase the surface area for heat exchange.

• Water flow: Horizontal
• Air flow: Vertical (crosses with water flow direction)

Counterflow Cooling Towers

In counterflow cooling towers, water flows vertically downward, while air flows upward, opposite to the direction of the water flow. Water is sprayed from the top of the tower and passes through the fill, while air is drawn in from the bottom and flows upward, absorbing heat in the process.

• Water flow: Vertical (downward)
• Air flow: Vertical (upward)

• (made by SPX)

2. Heat Exchange Efficiency

Both types of cooling towers aim to dissipate heat through heat exchange between air and water. However, due to the different directions of water and air flow, their heat exchange mechanisms differ.

• Crossflow Cooling Towers: In this design, the contact time between water and air is shorter, so the heat exchange efficiency is relatively lower. The horizontal water flow may also lead to uneven water distribution, which can affect the overall heat exchange efficiency.
• Counterflow Cooling Towers: The counterflow design allows for a more efficient heat exchange process. The upward flow of air and the downward flow of water result in a longer contact time between water and air, which improves heat exchange efficiency. The water distribution is more uniform, maximizing the effect of the fill.

Winner: Counterflow cooling towers generally have higher heat exchange efficiency due to better contact between air and water.

3. Space Requirements and Layout

The design of cooling towers directly impacts the amount of space required for installation.

• Crossflow Cooling Towers: These towers are typically more compact and require less vertical space. With air entering from the side and water flowing horizontally, their design is wider and shorter, making them ideal for spaces with height restrictions.
• Counterflow Cooling Towers: These towers are generally taller and more vertical in design, requiring more vertical space. Although they take up less floor space, they are better suited for areas with limited horizontal space but ample vertical space.

Winner: Crossflow cooling towers are more space-efficient when horizontal space is limited, while counterflow cooling towers are more suitable for areas with ample vertical space.

4. Maintenance and Accessibility

• Crossflow Cooling Towers: Maintenance is usually more convenient for crossflow cooling towers, as the water distribution system and fill are typically located on the sides of the tower, making inspection, cleaning, and repairs easier. Additionally, the fan motor is usually located at the top of the tower, simplifying maintenance.
• Counterflow Cooling Towers: Maintenance may be more challenging for counterflow cooling towers because the vertical design makes it harder to access the water distribution system, fill, and fans. Although the fan is usually located at the top, the vertical design may require more operational space for maintenance.

Winner: Crossflow cooling towers typically have an advantage in terms of maintenance due to easier accessibility.

5. Airflow

• Counterflow Cooling Towers: Due to the longer contact time between air and water, counterflow towers require less air volume.
• Crossflow Cooling Towers: Since the contact time between air and water is shorter, crossflow towers require more air volume to achieve heat exchange.

6. Fill Pack

Counterflow Tower Fill

In counterflow towers, the water flow direction is opposite to the airflow direction, so the fill must be designed to provide good heat exchange performance and anti-clogging properties. Common counterflow tower fill types include:

• Film Fill: Offers a large surface area and excellent heat exchange performance. For example, MC75 film fill uses a cross-wavy design to provide efficient heat transfer, with a uniform fill spacing of 0.75 inches between sheets.
• splash fill: Increases the contact between water and air by splashing, suitable for environments with lower heat exchange requirements.

Crossflow Tower Fill

In crossflow towers, the water flows horizontally, so the cooling tower fill must be designed to accommodate this unique air-water relationship. Common crossflow tower fill types include:

• Film Fill: Similar to counterflow towers, crossflow towers also use film fill. For example, the wave height of crossflow tower film fill is typically 19mm, and the widths are available in multiple specifications, such as 610mm, 915mm, and mm.
• Grid Fill: This fill has a larger porosity, making it suitable for situations where air resistance needs to be minimized.

7. Noise Level

• Crossflow Cooling Towers: These towers tend to produce more noise due to the fan system and water distribution components. The horizontal water flow may create some turbulence, increasing noise generation.
• Counterflow Cooling Towers: While counterflow towers also produce noise, the fan system is usually more efficient, and the vertical water flow helps reduce turbulence, making counterflow towers typically quieter than crossflow towers.

Winner: Counterflow cooling towers are generally quieter, making them more suitable for noise-sensitive environments.

For more information, please visit smc water tank.

8. Energy Efficiency

Energy efficiency is an important factor in the selection of cooling towers, especially for large-scale industrial applications.

• Crossflow Cooling Towers: These towers typically require more fan power because of their lower heat exchange efficiency. At high load conditions, this can lead to higher energy consumption. The larger air volume required results in higher fan power consumption, and the pump head is higher as the distribution system is above the fan platform.
• Counterflow Cooling Towers: Counterflow towers usually require less fan power because of their higher heat exchange efficiency. The lower fan power demand makes counterflow cooling towers more energy-efficient in operation. The air volume required is lower, resulting in lower fan power consumption, and the pump head is lower as the water inlet is located below the fan platform.

Winner: Counterflow cooling towers are typically more energy-efficient, especially in high-load applications.

9. Water Distribution and Performance

• Crossflow Cooling Towers: In crossflow towers, the horizontal water flow may lead to uneven water distribution, which can affect the performance of the tower under certain conditions. However, modern water distribution systems and better designs can alleviate this issue.
• Counterflow Cooling Towers: The vertical water flow in counterflow towers results in more uniform water distribution, providing more stable performance and ensuring efficient cooling under various load conditions.

Winner: Counterflow cooling towers provide more even water distribution and more stable performance.

10. Cost and Installation

• Crossflow Cooling Towers: Crossflow towers are generally simpler in design and easier to install, which can make them more cost-effective in some cases. They are often more compact, requiring less space for installation.
• Counterflow Cooling Towers: Counterflow towers have a more complex design and may require higher installation costs due to their vertical structure and increased height.

Winner: Crossflow cooling towers are generally less expensive to install.

Conclusion

Both crossflow and counterflow cooling towers offer unique benefits and are suitable for different applications. Counterflow cooling towers are generally more efficient in heat exchange, quieter, and more energy-efficient, making them ideal for large-scale industrial applications. On the other hand, crossflow cooling towers are typically simpler, more compact, and easier to maintain, making them a good choice for applications where space is limited or when lower initial costs are a priority. When choosing between the two, factors such as efficiency, space constraints, maintenance requirements, and noise considerations should be taken into account.

It’s important to regularly touch base on the basics of cooling towers to provide anyone new to the industry with vital information, but it’s also a good reminder for those who have been in the industry for many years. There are three basic flute geometry designs for modular film fills: cross flutes (CF), offset-vertical flutes (OF), and vertical flutes (VF). Each geometry has its own set of advantages and disadvantages in relation to fouling resistance and thermal performance.

Cross Flutes
Cross-fluted designs have been the industry standard for over 30 years. The nominal 30° from vertical flute orientation – 60° angle included between flutes on adjacent sheets – maximizes turbulence and air-water mixing, and high rates of heat transfer are created in relatively shallow fill sections (6’ and less).

Another important feature is this geometry’s ability to redistribute the falling water laterally so that a multi-layer fill section made up of alternating horizontal rows can fully “wet-out” the entire packed volume. This makes the cross-fluted geometry very thermally efficient but not very resistant to fouling. Because of the angled flutes, water film velocity is slowed and deposition of solids can readily occur. It is for this reason that Brentwood discourages CF fills in water that has a high degree of fouling potential.

Offset-Vertical Flutes
Like CF fills, the offset-vertical flute geometry allows for a high degree of air-water turbulence, and therefore, high heat transfer rates. A differentiating factor between the two fill types is that offset-fluted fills offer lower airside airflow resistance (pressure drop) than CF fills. The vertically oriented flutes allow for high water film velocity, thus allowing for a higher degree of fouling resistance than CF fills. Since the flutes are offset, the water can migrate laterally, as it does in CF fills, but to a lesser degree. For highly fouling water, however, OF designs should be considered only if achieving maximum thermal performance is required.

Vertical Flutes
Vertically oriented flute geometry allows the highest water film velocity and the highest degree of fouling resistance. New VF designs allow for high heat transfer rates but not as high as those of CF and OF designs. The high velocity water film significantly reduces the attachment of slime-forming bacteria, and therefore, the accumulation of silt. This type of media is recommended by Brentwood when the source water has strong fouling potential and thermal performance can be compromised.

The above references are for counterflow fill designs and their macro-structure. The same basics can be applied to film fills as well as for newer modular splash packs, or trickle packs. There has been a recent uptick in the requests for information regarding the fouling potential between a cross-fluted designed trickle pack and an offset vertical designed splash pack, like the HTP25. Even though these products may look very anti-fouling, the underlying principles of why packs foul is still at play. Cross-fluted designs still increase thermal performance at the expense of water velocity through the packs as compared to a vertically offset design due to the reduced water velocity and corresponding shear stresses.

Future blogs will dive deeper into fouling and we will be sharing some preliminary results from the Brentwood R&D fouling chamber, so keep an eye out!