Cable and Harness Testing: Checking the Quality of Connections
Cable and Harness Testing: Checking the Quality of Connections
Overview:
If you want to learn more, please visit our website.
Today, most companies manufacturing and/or integrating cables and wire harnesses, will test electrical integrity with programmable, automatic multiconductor testers – time-saving, productivity-boosting equipment that checks for and locates faults across all conductors of the Unit Under Test (UUT) without operator intervention.
Resistance measurement capability within a multiconductor cable tester is not simply for measuring the values of resistors.
As well as measuring any embedded resistors, the resistance-measuring feature of a cable tester is needed when measuring the quality of the connection and the quality of the non-connection. This test is recommended whether or not products have embedded resistors.
To check the quality of a connection, you must check for good intended connections as well as good intended non-connections (Fig. 2), and for that you need a tester that a) measures resistance, b) allows you to set up limits, also known as dual thresholds, and c) allows you to check for intermittent connections.
Without performing these checks, you run the risk of releasing or accepting faulty product. It is important to know and understand the parameters against which your cable or harness has been judged to have “passed”.
Figure 2: Good Connections and Non-Connections
What are “Dual Thresholds”?
Dual threshold set-up is required to check for connection quality (Fig. 3).
Without measuring resistance, the tester will tell you when your intended connection is connected (passing a simple continuity check), but not whether that connection is compromised by something that affects the total resistance of that connection perhaps, for example, because of poor soldering. In short, resistance measurement capability within a tester is not simply for measuring the values of resistors.
For most cables, you do not need to measure the actual resistance of each wire. Rather, you would like to confirm that the resistance of a good connection does not exceed a maximum limit, and that the isolation between unconnected wires does not fall below a minimum limit. We refer to these two limits as thresholds.
Figure 3: Dual Thresholds
CableEye measures embedded resistors automatically when the resistor value falls between the high and low thresholds. When you save a cable in the database, the resistance values associated with any embedded resistors are saved along with the tolerance, wire list, and other cable information. Thus, embedded resistors become one of the characteristics of the stored cable and must be present in a test cable to successfully match against the saved data.
For this example (Fig. 4), the Maximum Conductor Resistance Permitted has been user defined within the software as 0.5 Ω and the Minimum Isolation Resistance Permitted has been set to 1 MΩ. The cable measured contains a resistor between pins 5 and 5. The 2.70 kΩ resistor falls not only between the upper and lower limits of measurement shown on the drawing above (e.g. 0.02 Ω and 6 MΩ for the Model M4), but also between the user-programmed resistance limits, so it is displayed as an embedded resistor.
Conductors between SH, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9 are all under 0.5 Ω, and are displayed as good quality connections. The connection between pins 7 and 7 is above 0.80 Ω, which is above the Maximum Conductor Resistance permitted. This line is highlighted as a fault, and the cable is failed.
You can easily experiment with your own tester if you have a selection of resistors and a test interface fixture with screw terminals. Connect the resistors to the test interface fixture and adjust the resistance thresholds to see how the tester displays the results.
Figure 4: Example of Netlist (Top) and Wiring (Bottom) Results
What Constitutes an Acceptable Connection Resistance?
The Maximum Conductor Resistance Permitted sets the highest value of resistance acceptable for a “good” connection.
Wire connections in a cable that exceed your maximum resistance threshold will be flagged as defective. High-resistance connections like this may be caused by incomplete crimps, by insufficient mating between the knife-pin and wire conductor in IDC flat cables, or by cold solder joints in soldered connections. These marginal connections may then result in circuit misoperation, intermittent connections, or physical heating in the cable if enough current flows through that connection.
In a properly managed cable assembly shop, high resistance connections occur rarely. However, resistance testing is needed to ensure that absolutely no bad cables make their way into a customer’s product. This is especially important for product destined for mission-critical applications such as aerospace, military, and medical devices. For example, you may set CableEye HVX-series continuity and HiPot systems to check for an acceptable connection resistance of as little as a few milliohms (refer to Fig. 3 for other models). Such low resistance checking is often recommended for shells and shields.
The best test systems will allow you to optimize your test by letting you set different thresholds for different conductors in your cable or harness. For example, you may set the Maximum Conductor Resistance Permitted to a very small value only for the shells and shields, and other values for the other conductors.
If you set this value to less than 5 Ω, the measurement time may increase by a factor of two or more due to the increased sensitivity you are asking for, and you may pick up marginally higher resistance values that will have no effect on the function of the cable. Other than for shells and shields, use the smallest threshold of 0.5 Ω or less only when you test power cables or any cables that are expected to carry significant current (20 gauge or thicker wire).
What Constitutes a Short Circuit?
The Minimum Isolation Resistance Permitted sets the lowest value of isolation resistance acceptable for unconnected wires.
In addition to certifying that a wire connection passes a low resistance test, we must also ensure that internal short circuits do not exist. While this seems obvious, we need to define exactly what constitutes a short circuit.
To certain sensitive electronic devices, especially in medical applications, a “short circuit” may exist in a cable when as much as a 1 MΩ (or higher) resistance path appears between two pins.
In contrast, the high output drive capability of present-day CMOS digital circuits can easily maintain the logic ‘1’ minimum voltage across a short circuit of as small as several hundred ohms.
Ideally, we would like an infinite resistance between isolated conductors. As a practical matter, though, a lesser amount will be quite adequate for most applications. We recommend a minimum isolation threshold of 1 MΩ for general purposes, although you may set the isolation threshold to a higher value, depending on your tester model. Refer to Fig. 2 to determine the maximum value that you can set your isolation threshold to.
Note that the contact resistance of dry human skin is about 2 or 3 MΩ. To minimize the likelihood of false negatives during production testing, we recommend setting the isolation threshold above 1 MΩ only when you are testing cables that will be used in a high voltage or extremely low current application.
Why Check for Intermittent Connections?
We define an intermittent connection as a temporary but radical change in resistance between two points occurring unpredictably when motion or stress is applied or when a change in temperature causes expansion or contraction of an electrical contact.
Poorly mated pins, broken wires, and poor bonding, among other things, may cause intermittent connections. Checks for intermittent faults are performed after a successful, static continuity and resistance check.
An intermittent open circuit applies to a low resistance connection which, for a short period of time, becomes disconnected (high resistance). An intermittent short circuit applies to two normally unconnected conductors which, for a brief period of time, short together (low resistance).
The intermittence test is dynamic: During the test, you flex the connectors and apply stress (including pull) to the cable (Fig. 1) while the tester sends a continuous stream of test pulses under fast cycle times. A full cycle comprises a complete sweep through all test points.
The CableEye software offers two methods for checking for intermittent connections; one detects continuity differences only (opens/shorts) and another detects and reports resistance variations. Furthermore, to report the resistance variations there are two options, 2-Wire or 4-Wire resistance measurements. The Continuity Only Test offers the fastest scan rate.
The test is properly performed when the sample rate is high enough to statistically capture enough random events to raise the confidence level in the test result to an acceptably high degree. Companies running stringent quality programs (such as Six Sigma) will be looking for the fastest cycle time possible. They need testers that deliver diagnostic information above a simple PASS/FAIL, so they can provide quantitative and qualitative data to their process-improvement feedback loop.
In advanced testers such as CableEye systems, when the test runs, a tone will sound if any faults are found, the error count will increment, and a wiring diagram will display all accumulated intermittent connections highlighted (Fig. 4). In this case, we see an intermittent short between pins 2 and 3 and an intermittent open between 1 and 1 were detected. With 19 full test cycles being completed every second, in 570 test cycles, 22 error events were detected.
You will get efficient and thoughtful service from saimr.
Additional reading:How to Save Money When Buying Portable Explosion Proof Lighting
It is clear that this is a faulty cable and this test has correctly identified it as such – in addition to identifying and locating the errors. If this dynamic test had not been performed, this cable would have been falsely determined to “PASS”: all tester indicators, labels, and reports would incorrectly show as “PASS”.
Note that with a slower test cycle frequency, fewer of these error events would have been detected. At a slow enough rate, despite running an intermittence test, none might be detected resulting in a false “PASS”. It is important to pay attention to the cycle rate setting.
Clearly, checking for faults in this way will be able to tell you exactly which, if any, wire has a break. Generally, the most likely location of a break is at the end of the wire i.e. at the connector. If a cable has been pulled (experienced tension), it is possible that a break might occur along the length. Cables for robotic applications might break along the length especially if the repetitive motion causes the cable to rub against a hard point or exceed the recommended radius of curvature.
Figure 5: Real-time intermittence testing identifies a) the number of passes and errors, b) the type of error (color-coded), c) the location of the error.
Conclusion
It is a common misconception that measuring resistance is only required if the product has embedded resistors. We have shown the importance of checking the quality of connections and that this requires the ability to measure resistance, to set upper and lower limits, and to check for intermittent connections.
It is also a common mistake to assume that a cable is fault-free just because a tester PASS light lit up, or because you have an auto-generated printed report with a “PASS” title.
Be sure you understand the pass parameters against which the tester is making the determination.
Check that your test system is capable of measuring the quality of the connections, and that it has been set up to do so with the right values for your product and its application.
If you are subcontracting your harness and cable manufacturing, ask your supplier to confirm this information and, if necessary, to reset the pass criteria on their tester.
Our thanks to CAMI Research Inc. for this paper. If you would like to contact CAMI, you can do so at (978) 266 , or go to camiresearch.com.
Cable & Harness Testers | Systems | Articles | CableEye
Improving Quality of Testing: Defense Imaging Systems Cables and Harnesses
Review of three test use cases within a single defense contract company: Test evaluation of returned product; testing complete systems; and design of test cables. Read more (html)
Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Vehicular Applications — Automotive, Commercial, Industrial, Military
Review of cable test and assembly interface options for cables and harnesses with vehicular applications (automotive, commercial, industrial, and defense implementations). Read more (html)
Achieving 10 GΩ IR Measurements at 100 Vdc
Creative Use of Existing Instrumentation to Meet Exacting Requirement. Read more (html)
Creative Motorsport Solutions On Improving Quality of Testing Motor Racing Cables and Harnesses
Creative Motorport Solutions describe advantages of using CableEye test equipment. Read more (html)
Insourcing Cable Manufacturing and Testing
How EVCables.com found its perfect match with the CableEye tester from CAMI
Research. Read more (html)
Interesting and Unusual Applications of Cable Testing
A review of some of the more unusual applications we have encountered over the years. Read more (html)
Common Misconceptions in Testing Electrical Cables
We explore limitations of continuity and HiPot testing, disproving three commonly held misconceptions. Read more (html)
Verifying Twist Pair Relationships with a Continuity Tester
We discuss testing of twisted pair cables and why a twisted cable that passes continuity alone is not a fail-safe indicator that wire twists are wired correctly. We show which twist errors can be detected with a simple continuity test, and which require a twist wire measurement. Read more (html)
Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Checking the Quality of Connections
Without performing these checks, you run the risk of releasing or accepting faulty product. It is important to know and understand the parameters against which your cable or harness has been judged to have “passed”. Read more (html)
Five Qs to ask when selecting a Cable and Harness Tester
Ready to purchase a new tester? Ask these questions of your potential supplier.
Read more (html)
Automation-Ready Cable and Harness Testers: CableEye Tester Upgrades and Reconditioning
Here we describe cost-effective ways of updating the capabilities of your CableEye tester. Read more (html)
Testing Shielded Cables at High Voltage
We show that it is not necessary to apply voltage to shield conductors to accurately test insulation resistance as long as the shields remain at zero volts when the other wires are tested at high voltage.
Read more (html)
Probando Cables y Conectores en Electrodomésticos
Probar la continuidad y aislamiento utilizando probadores de cables multi conductores es una parte esencial del proceso de trabajo. Las pruebas exhaustivas antes y después de la instalación reducen las probabilidades de fallas del dispositivo, incluyendo eventos catastróficos como incendios e inundaciones. En este articulo introducimos un entendimiento básico de lo que implican pruebas exhaustivas de continuidad y de HiPot.
Leer mas (html)Feb 28,
Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Testing Medical Electronic Equipment & Devices
Testing continuity & HiPot using multiconductor cable testers is an essential part of the workflow. Thorough testing prior to and after installation reduces the likelihood of device failure including catastrophic events such as fire. It is simply not sufficient to rely on “glow-wire” specifications to prevent fire. In this article we introduce a basic understanding of what ‘thorough’ continuity and HiPot testing entails.
Read more (html)
Revised Feb 14,Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Protecting your Cable Tester
Our dependence on complex systems in modern manufacturing leaves us vulnerable to unexpected process failure that may have expensive consequences. While we cannot foresee the future, our awareness of failure modes should lead to simple preventve measures. Employ these precautions to help avoid preventable accidents that extract a heavy cost in time and inconvenience to correct.
Read more (html)
Revised Feb 7,Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Cable Tester Automation
A cable tester manufacturer's approach to automate test, fault isolation, labeling, and documentation to ensure test consistency and reduce susceptibility to human error.
Read more (html)
Electrically Testing Long Cables
Learn how parasitic capacitance can affect your safety and the accuracy of your results when testing cables longer than 10ft.
Read more (html)
Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Smart Assembly & Test
What to look for in a tester when creating a smart cable & harness assembly and test line, especially when following a mixed-model manufacturing process.
Read more (html)
Improving Cable Quality & Reliability - Resistance Measurement to within 1 mΩ
A How-To Guide: Precision resistance measurements of less than 0.1 Ω reveal wiring defects not visible to less sensitive measurements. Use this measurement technique to improve cable quality and reliability.
Read more (html)
Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Cables in Motion - Diagnostics
A must-read for makers of robotic systems: Cables in motion experience fatigue causing complete or intermittent failures whether or not that motion is constant. Learn how cable and harness test systems can easily identify and pinpoint the source of even the most elusive intermittent failure.
Read more (html)
Cable and Harness Manufacturing: CableEye Cable Test and Management System, Q&A
What are the alternatives to the CableEye brand and how do they compare?
Who benefits from using the system?
How does cable and harness testing with a CableEye test system increase productivity?
Can all cables/connectors be tested ...?
How much time can be saved ...?
How much more productive will a user be ...?
Read more (html)
Cable and Harness Manufacturing: Productivity through Flexibility
Learn how to choose a cable & harness tester that remains relevant as product design changes in addition to providing fast, reliable, accurate results. See how it can improve productivity even beyond the production floor.
Read more (html)
The company is the world’s best harness tester factory for military supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.