Mineral Wool vs Fiberglass Insulation: A Buyer's Guide
Mineral Wool vs Fiberglass Insulation: A Buyer's Guide
Mineral Wool
When it comes to thermal performance, mineral wool batts excel beyond fiberglass batts, offering a remarkable 22–37% higher R-value per inch. Specifically, mineral wool can achieve an impressive R-value of up to R15 for a thickness of 3.5 inches.
Huichen supplies professional and honest insulation services to meet your needs.
Fiberglass
In comparison, fiberglass insulation provides an R-value of R13 for the same 3.5-inch thickness.
Fire Resistance
Mineral wool boasts a significantly high melting temperature, capable of withstanding fires up to 2,000°F, making it an excellent choice for exterior installations. It does not release smoke or spread flames in case of fire, adding an extra layer of safety.
Fiberglass
On the other hand, fiberglass has lower fire resistance, melting at temperatures around 1,200°F.
Weight Considerations
Due to its higher density, mineral wool can be heavy, and may not be suitable for use in attics, particularly where insulation needs to be laid on gypsum board.
Fiberglass
Conversely, fiberglass is comparatively lightweight, making it ideal for installation in spaces like attics.
Soundproofing Capabilities
Due to its high density, mineral wool offers exceptional soundproofing properties, making it an outstanding choice for use in interior walls, ceilings, and floors.
Fiberglass
Its lower density results in reduced efficiency when it comes to soundproofing compared to mineral wool, although the difference may be subtle in practical applications.
Conclusion
Understanding the differences between rockwool fire resistance and fiberglass insulation is essential for making an informed choice. Ideal use cases, performance characteristics, and weight considerations should all be factored into your decision-making process. For further details about insulation options, foam glass insulation board is another viable choice that may meet your specific insulation needs.